The restaurant industry continues to debate the value of celebrity chefs with their reality shows and entertaining “cooking” shows. Most of us know the public’s perception of these fictional programs is based on the entertainment value as opposed to the real cooking element presented. I am sure I am not the only restaurateur that has laughed as Emeril flubs another dish as they go to break for a million dollar commercial. Personally, I am not convinced these TV personalities have much of an impact on the food business other than their own ability to sell products and advertising.

One thing is clear. Just because they can brand their name and open restaurants across the country, that doesn’t mean success is guaranteed. The customer still has expectations that must be met for an extended restaurant life. No one truly believes the fantasy of Gordon Ramsay’s Hell’s Kitchen or the business mess of Rocco’s. Few of these stars have escaped the pad locks that decorate their closed ventures. Ramsay has three closures in the last six months. Under the marketing conditions in the coming year, there will be many more celebs packing it in.

The difference between the celebrity restaurants and the “real” operations that open up is the amount of initial publicity. Robert Irvine, recently deposed from the Food Network, has been planning two restaurants in the St. Petersburg, Florida luxury district downtown for many months. The publicity has been non-stop for six months since the announcement. No independent food operation garners such attention. We do it the old fashion way - one customer at a time.

The basic elements for long term survival must be employed by any venture. You have to create a real connection with the customer. The connection cannot be based on  short lived hype or legend. It must offer an experience that guest will savor, send and save. They will savor the experience by meeting their expectations. Customers will send the experience on to friends and family by word of mouth. Finally they save the visit in their mind for many return visits. If your restaurant doesn’t capture the guest with a connection, no amount of publicity will salvage your ultimate fate.

Larry Edger, Author

The Restaurant Ebook

There is a study done by Restaurant Hospitality magazine that says 27% of restaurant diners have quit going to a particular restaurant in the past year because of “poor service”. That is over one fourth of the people eating out quit going to someone’s restaurant. Was one of them yours?

The problem is defining what poor service means to various segments of the population. Is it rude servers, long ticket times, not visiting tables often enough, forgetting condiments, slow follow up or some combination of these? It may take another survey or more customer feedback to define “poor service”.

Some research I did for the mini-ebook titled “Pardon Me, But Your Customers Want to Talk To You” may be a glimpse into what guests think bad service really is. For about a month I collected individual reviews posted on blog sites, restaurant review websites and newspaper reviews on restaurants that subsequently closed their doors. It was tedious research, but the quotes from the restaurants’ customers were so compelling, I couldn’t stop. The thought crossed my mind that if the owner had read these comments well before he closed his doors, could he have changed his destiny.

The research found that “bad service” was by far the terms most used by customers about the vast majority of the closed operations. Assuming “bad service” and “poor service” are interchangeable, then comments from those who further defined bad service will help define the term. In almost every instance waiting long periods of time for any guest service was an issue and reason given for the restaurant’s closing. In rare circumstances did the customers cite bad food as the cause.

A synopsis of those comments were;· Waiting to be greeted.· Waiting for the table to be visited by a server.· Waiting for drinks to be delivered.· Waiting for the order to be taken.· Waiting for food to be delivered.· Waiting for a return visit by the server.· Waiting for the check.

Obviously, waiting for any facet of the guest’s experience was the single most frustrating part of the dining experience. How many of these bottlenecks do you have in your restaurant? Do you know? What have you done to correct them?

Based on the comments of guests from closed operations, now might be a good time to find out the answers to the questions above.

Larry Edger, Author
The Restaurant Ebook